School Information » Charter » Latest Goals
Respect across the board – for God, ourselves and others.
While Hillview pupils seem to have a high level of respect for their classroom teachers, there have been incidents where the level of respect for ‘alternative’ staff has dropped during lessons. The term ‘alternative’ refers to any person who is not in the role of fulltime homeroom/classroom teacher (including relievers, release teachers, Technology teachers from other schools, teachers of specialist subjects, parent helpers, bus drivers and other members of the community).
As a Christian school it would be an excellent witness to be developing young people who are aware of others as human beings created in God’s image, therefore deserving of respect. This important value would also extend to the management and conservation of equipment and school property.
While the students at Hillview are warm, friendly and high achieving, it would be of benefit to them to lift their level of respect as a student body regardless of whether they are struggling to give their full attention or a unfamiliar teaching approach has been engaged in the class.
Indications for the relevance of this goal:
By the end of 2009, Hillview students will have shown an increase in their understanding of the value of respect and this will be evidenced by
A reduction of 30% of incidents, where pupils exhibit negative behaviour with ‘alternative’ staff(other than class
teacher), occurring from May to November,
In May, we will give out appropriate survey forms to ‘alternative’ staff and ask them to answer honestly the number of negative incidences they observe.
In November, we will carry out the same exercise and discover if we have a 30% reduction.
In 2008 we aimed for an increase in Written Language and Reading for particular year levels that we had identified “as not achieving as high as may have been expected”. Having analysed the Written Language and STAR Reading results in September 2008, we have not achieved as much progress as had been hoped.
The data is recorded below:
|
YEAR |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
|
YEAR 2 |
1.7 |
1.6 |
1.7 |
1.9 |
1.8 |
|
YEAR 3 |
2.2 |
2.0 |
1.9 |
2.2 |
2.1 |
|
YEAR 4 |
2.6 |
2.6 |
2.8 |
2.7 |
2.7 |
|
YEAR 5 |
3.4 |
3.4 |
3.7 |
3.3 |
3.3 |
|
YEAR 6 |
3.5 |
3.7 |
3.6 |
3.7 |
3.6 |
|
YEAR 7 |
4.3 |
3.9 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
4.3 |
|
YEAR 8 |
4.6 |
4.8 |
4.4 |
4.9 |
4.7 |
|
YEAR 9 |
4.6 |
4.7 |
5.1 |
4.8 |
5.3 |
|
YEAR 10 |
|
5.0 |
5.2 |
5.4 |
5.2 |
|
YEAR |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
|
Year 3 |
6.7 |
7.1 |
6.7 |
6.7 |
|
Year 4 |
6.6 |
6.6 |
7.3 |
7.2 |
|
Year 5 |
6.2 |
7.4 |
6.3 |
6.9 |
|
Year 6 |
6.8 |
6.2 |
6.7 |
6.3 |
|
Year 7 |
6.2 |
7.0 |
6.6 |
6.8 |
|
Year 8 |
7.2 |
6.6 |
7.5 |
6.9 |
|
Year 9 |
6.7 |
6.4 |
6.7 |
7.0 |
Therefore, we would like to reset the goal for 2009 and target the following groups:
Target
To lift the standard of written language and reading with Year 7 and 8 classes so the following two goals are met:
The average Written Language level in the 2009 September Survey will lift from 2.1 (2008) to 2.8 (2009) for Year 3, 3.6 (2008) to 4.3(2009) for Year 7 and 4.3 (2008) to 4.9 (2009) for Year 8.
The average reading stanines for the STAR Reading test will lift from 6.7 (2008) to 7.3 (2009) for Year 4, 6.3 to 6.8 for the Year 7 class and from 6.8 to 7.3 for the Year 8 class from September 2008 to September 2009.
Programmes to Assist the Achievement of the Target
Resourcing
Procedure
Data will be collected in 2009 September Survey and this will be compared with the data collected from the 2008 September Survey,
Rationale
The 2008 PAT results below suggest that in the last 3 years, as a whole school, we have plateaued in our listening skills. For example, the average Listening Comprehension stanine from 2006-2008 was 5.9(67th percentile). Admittedly this is well above what you would expect from a Decile 6 school. However, since we believe that “sharp” listening skills is an essential educational ingredient to a positive future we would like to see whether we can lift this achievement even higher.
School-Wide Performance (as at 31 March 2009)
|
Standardised Class Percentiles |
Reading Vocabulary |
Reading Comprehension |
Listening Comprehension |
Mathemetics |
|
2000 |
56 |
57 |
62 |
60 |
|
2001 |
57 |
58 |
63 |
60 |
|
2002 |
58 |
60 |
63 |
64 |
|
2003 |
61 |
62 |
64 |
62 |
|
2004 |
61 |
62 |
64 |
62 |
|
2005 |
63 |
63 |
66 |
64 |
|
2006 |
65 |
66 |
67 |
5.6 (61) |
|
2007 |
65 |
65 |
67 |
5.9 (67) |
|
2008 |
6.0 (69) |
6.2 (72) |
5.9 (67) |
5.9 (67) |
|
2009 |
5.9 (67) |
6.1 (70) |
5.9 (67) |
5.6 (61) |
Target
To lift the school wide Listening Comprehension average stanine from 5.9 (67th percentile) March 2008 to 6.2 (72nd percentile) in March 2010.
Programmes to Assist the Achievement of the Target
Resourcing
Procedure
Data will be collected in 2009 PAT assessment and this will be compared with the data collected from the 2010 PAT assessment.